PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.06%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.70%
EBIT growth 50-75% of KGC's 28.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
16.70%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of KGC's 28.46%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-306.84%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 262.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-306.67%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 260.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-306.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 240.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.14%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above KGC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-9.68%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.85%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 85.33%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
27.22%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 858.57%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 30.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-32.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
44.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
141.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 120.33%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-47.98%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
46.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 90.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 106.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-321.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 116.17%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
215.88%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
26.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 7.02% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
62.84%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 62.84% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-45.82%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 2.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-3.45%
We have a declining book value while KGC shows 4.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-9.84%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 6.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.