PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while KGC stands at 10.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 41.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Negative EBIT growth while KGC is at 72.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-14.45%
Negative operating income growth while KGC is at 72.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
149.47%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.39%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
105.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 33.69%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-22.48%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 5.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
91.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with KGC's 89.26%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-39.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 7.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
23.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-59.13%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
15.47%
Below 50% of KGC's 1553.60%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
205.07%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.81%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while KGC invests at 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Under 50% of KGC's 1.76%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.90%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 5.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.