PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.24%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of KGC's 67.25%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
61.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 359.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
61.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 359.76%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x KGC's 333.57%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
766.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 314.59%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x KGC's 325.23%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while KGC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.97%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 37.11%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.36%
FCF growth under 50% of KGC's 85.25%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
264.31%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
9.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.83%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
210.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is at 10.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-5.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 10.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
130.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-42.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while KGC is 99.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
26.90%
Below 50% of KGC's 73.48%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
180.93%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
22.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 2.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Asset growth well under 50% of KGC's 1.90%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 10.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 29.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.