PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.19%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.00%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.86%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 17.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 8.93%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
43.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 21.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
254.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 298.11%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
134.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 39.60%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
90.98%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 49.05%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
16.45%
Below 50% of KGC's 42.32%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 1745.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.90%
1.25-1.5x KGC's 1.54%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-98.25%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.