PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x KGC's 4.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Positive gross profit growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
47.82%
Positive EBIT growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
47.82%
Positive operating income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.74%
Positive net income growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.02%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.02%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.51%
Dividend growth under 50% of KGC's 9.12%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
45.21%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 1.66%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-388.43%
Negative FCF growth while KGC is at 1.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
51.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 21.20%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 41.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
11.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 108.84%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
124.71%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to KGC's 118.52%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
18.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
41.52%
Below 50% of KGC's 108.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2319.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 328.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
6.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.87%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
31.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 30.22%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
20.68%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
68.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 68.43% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
95.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 95.52% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
45.29%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KGC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-1.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 1.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-43.80%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while KGC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
Positive BV/share change while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
SG&A growth well above KGC's 5.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.