PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.18%
Negative gross profit growth while KGC is at 24.25%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.08%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.61%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 63.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 58.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 57.04%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x KGC's 0.93%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-11.81%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-9.47%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
40.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 22.66%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
28.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 39.43%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-9.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 11.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 43.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
81.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 29.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-6.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC stands at 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
62.13%
Below 50% of KGC's 236.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
180.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 68.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
0.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.55%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
32.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 36.31%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
20.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Firm’s AR is declining while KGC shows 159.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.54%
Asset growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.74%
Similar to KGC's 1.73%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-4.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.