PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of KGC's 13.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 31.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 58.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 58.05%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-25.44%
Negative net income growth while KGC stands at 97.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while KGC is at 96.08%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while KGC is at 97.90%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above KGC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
OCF growth under 50% of KGC's 87.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
176.60%
FCF growth 50-75% of KGC's 304.21%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
58.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 24.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
55.15%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 48.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-10.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC stands at 25.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 244.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 83.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
7.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of KGC's 58.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.96%
Below 50% of KGC's 345.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
196.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 200.56%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-26.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 81.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
61.34%
Positive growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
37.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 37.01%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
19.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
144.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 144.99% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
115.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 115.34% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 1.06%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
80.90%
AR growth well above KGC's 0.32%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-8195400.00%
Inventory is declining while KGC stands at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.97%
Similar asset growth to KGC's 0.91%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
1.18%
Under 50% of KGC's 2.87%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
We expand SG&A while KGC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.