PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.44%
Positive revenue growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
60.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x KGC's 28.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-31.17%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-33.15%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-43.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.25%
Share reduction while KGC is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.19%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while KGC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
25.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x KGC's 0.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-8.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
121.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 39.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
68.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 44.94%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
35.77%
Positive 3Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
177.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of KGC's 225.18%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
139.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 83.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
38.48%
Below 50% of KGC's 117.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
12.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-70.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while KGC is 526.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 10.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
34.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 31.57%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
15.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while KGC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
235.15%
Dividend/share CAGR of 235.15% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
103.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 103.88% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
21.23%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KGC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-47.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Asset growth at 50-75% of KGC's 1.00%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
0.24%
Under 50% of KGC's 3.05%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-8.70%
We’re deleveraging while KGC stands at 16.20%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.40%
We cut SG&A while KGC invests at 204.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.