95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth under 50% of KGC's 15.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.64%
Gross profit growth under 50% of KGC's 35.45%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
13.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of KGC's 36.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.42%
Operating income growth under 50% of KGC's 35.83%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.07%
Net income growth under 50% of KGC's 44.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 43.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of KGC's 43.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while KGC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while KGC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
Positive OCF growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-74.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x KGC's 114.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 76.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
65.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 123.02%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
238.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
170.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while KGC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
384.37%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 696.49%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
173.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to KGC's 178.23%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
95.04%
Below 50% of KGC's 1495.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x KGC's 48.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with KGC's 38.56%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of KGC's 28.28%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
282.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 282.43% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.17% while KGC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
25.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while KGC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
147.04%
Our AR growth while KGC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth at 50-75% of KGC's 4.88%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.43%
Under 50% of KGC's 57.04%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.99%
Debt growth far above KGC's 0.26%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.