95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.06%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.06%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
13.98%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.98%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-368.18%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 15.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-366.67%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 15.79%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-366.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 15.79%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.29%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 473.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.29%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 82.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NEM stands at 9.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.98%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.