PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
35.21%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 29.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
35.21%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of NEM's 59.70%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
103.36%
EBIT growth below 50% of NEM's 871.96%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
103.36%
Operating income growth under 50% of NEM's 871.96%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
103.36%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 820.51%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
103.35%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 601.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
103.35%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 601.57%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.25%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 72.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
86.25%
FCF growth 75-90% of NEM's 96.37%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.60%
AR growth well above NEM's 9.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.87%
Inventory growth well above NEM's 2.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.90%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.98%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.38%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 35.26%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.