PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 11.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
20.55%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 148.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 148.01%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-56.84%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 244.87%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-83.65%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-83.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.10%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 9.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
26.10%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to NEM's 25.00%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
26.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
21.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 110.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.99%
We show growth while NEM is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 4.97%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.57%
Under 50% of NEM's 5.53%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 122.17%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.