PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.05%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 20.04%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.05%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 39.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.12%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 102.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.12%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 102.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-25.48%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 25.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
171.04%
EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 27.27%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
171.04%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 27.27%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-185.05%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 135.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-185.05%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 229.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
35.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.93%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
35.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 8.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
15.00%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NEM's 16.60%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-224.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.74%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while NEM stands at 99.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-29.74%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NEM is at 53.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-31.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NEM is at 92.39%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.53%
AR growth well above NEM's 17.41%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
17.35%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. NEM's 146.52%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-13.66%
Negative asset growth while NEM invests at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-23.19%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.