PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
38.65%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
73.73%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
73.73%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.05%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 33.23%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
63.85%
EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 21.43%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
63.85%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 21.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
36511827.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 537.72%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 72.34%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth well above NEM's 12.80%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 8.81%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
75-90% of NEM's 17.15%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-11.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 49.70%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.