95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.14%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
70.16%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
78.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 17.51%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
78.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 17.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
96.62%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 237.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
84.21%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 235.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
105.88%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 228.57%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.11%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-3124.58%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.04%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to NEM's 77.24%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
36841732.28%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 15.44%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
59.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 19.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 442.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
14311.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 55.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26453.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 340.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1590.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 59.90%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
672.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 39.57%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.16%
AR growth well above NEM's 19.65%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-28.98%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 9.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
117.23%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.09%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
50.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.80%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.