95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.51%
Revenue growth under 50% of NEM's 32.49%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
6.54%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NEM's 43.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
118.24%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 104.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
118.24%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 104.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
5.52%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 12.63%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth at 75-90% of NEM's 11.36%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
11.11%
Similar diluted EPS growth to NEM's 11.36%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.25%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.72%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.55%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 90.67%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.55%
FCF growth under 50% of NEM's 92.61%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
160.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 89.38%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
144.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 37.42%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
42.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 67.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2634.32%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 22.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
43040.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 161.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3534.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 343.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
405.46%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 38.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
766.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 164.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
921.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 19.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 104.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.88%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 3.17%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.73%
Similar to NEM's 3.79%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.28%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.