PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
32.57%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.93%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.93%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.71%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.22%
Positive EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.39%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.49%
Diluted share change of 1.49% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.93%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 20.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
26.93%
FCF growth 50-75% of NEM's 51.40%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
196.70%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 8.23%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
135.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 37.83%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
137.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.10%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2148.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 152.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
271.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 12.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2063.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
193.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1201.26%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 18.35%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
144.59%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.70%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.67%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 4.10%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.54%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.49%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.77%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 590.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.