PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.48%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.13%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.13%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.66%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.66%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.47%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
180.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 43.98%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
89.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NEM's 81.88%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
92.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 48.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 271.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 167.26%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 166.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.49%
Below 50% of NEM's 432.45%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 32.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
261.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 4.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 7.67%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 7.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
27.56%
Debt growth far above NEM's 6.32%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.