PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-82.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-95.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-95.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-362.24%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-300.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-325.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
16.15%
Share change of 16.15% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 3.74%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.52%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 15.08%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
1.52%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
80.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 44.86%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-0.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NEM stands at 53.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
44.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.76%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25090.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 38.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
89.40%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-966.69%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1055.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
129.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.08%
AR growth well above NEM's 1.55%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-9.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
5.91%
Debt growth far above NEM's 1.29%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.39%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.