PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.31%
Revenue growth under 50% of NEM's 15.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
428.44%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NEM's 47.47%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1191.12%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 518.37%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1191.12%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 518.37%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
130.31%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 1790.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
133.33%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 1786.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 1786.79%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.83%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 69.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-7.04%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 119.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
80.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 65.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
201.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 28.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM stands at 28.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1448.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 10.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
13.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 56.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.84%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 103.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-25.18%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2112.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 10.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
94.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.40%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 67.89%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 7.49%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
27.41%
50-75% of NEM's 38.54%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-58.40%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.83%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NEM's 500.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.