PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 22.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
45.14%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 32.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
50.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
50.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 32.73%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
51.37%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 43.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
36.36%
EPS growth at 75-90% of NEM's 44.30%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of NEM's 44.30%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share change of 9.14% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
140.85%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 103.17%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
179.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 84.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
33.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 58.42%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 54.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 113.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 164.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
Below 50% of NEM's 129.84%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 21.66%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 37.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while NEM invests at 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 6.38%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.