PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.55%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.29%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
31.40%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
31.40%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
19.33%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-73.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.23%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.16%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.51%
Reduced diluted shares while NEM is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 5.31%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
17.36%
FCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 6.90%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
78.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 136.43%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
140.24%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 94.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
48.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NEM's 51.58%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 401.91%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
55.50%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NEM's 211.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
285.93%
Below 50% of NEM's 592.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
50.62%
Below 50% of NEM's 116.98%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
440.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 29.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
60.50%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 44.56%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.50%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.55%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.91%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-75.82%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.