PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 964.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 230.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 230.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 119.71%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 119.70%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 119.70%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-61.46%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 52.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 109.94%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 81.29%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 29.87%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
73.48%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 72.25%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 101.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 185.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 89.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 58.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 30.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of NEM's 1.22%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 1.93%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.