PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.00%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-1.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.07%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.72%
Positive net income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share count expansion well above NEM's 2.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.94%
Diluted share count expanding well above NEM's 2.31%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.62%
Positive OCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
113.34%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
252.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 67.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
46.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-28.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
388.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 184.43%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
38.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-44.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 23.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
230.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 27.18% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-14.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1009.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 23.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
105.03%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
37.47%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.64%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
3.32%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NEM's 25.69%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while NEM stands at 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while NEM invests at 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.41%
We have a declining book value while NEM shows 4.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-10.63%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 15.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.