PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.02%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.37%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.37%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.53%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 17.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share change of 0.07% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x NEM's 0.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-29.69%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 48.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3.56%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 30.23%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.57%
FCF growth under 50% of NEM's 43.15%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
157.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
0.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NEM stands at 0.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 4.48%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is at 11.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM stands at 97.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
74.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-55.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1100.37%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
235.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 23.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
36.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
65.81%
Below 50% of NEM's 188.06%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
56.16%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.01%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.66%
Under 50% of NEM's 1.59%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.