PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.06%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 12.42%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
16.70%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.10%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
16.70%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 3.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-306.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.14%
Share change of 0.14% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-9.68%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
27.85%
OCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 9.64%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
27.22%
Positive FCF growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
143.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 24.40%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-32.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
44.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
141.95%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-47.98%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
46.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 26.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-379.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-162.02%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-321.70%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
215.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 19.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
26.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.02%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while NEM is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
62.84%
Below 50% of NEM's 212.70%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-45.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.45%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.84%
We’re deleveraging while NEM stands at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.81%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 13.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.