PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.39%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
367.01%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 52.08%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
380.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 52.78%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
380.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x NEM's 50.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
OCF growth under 50% of NEM's 51.71%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-483.01%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 340.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
90.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is at 29.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
12.80%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
590.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 113.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 284.25%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
227.59%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 7.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
30.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
71.00%
Below 50% of NEM's 537.39%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
453.10%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x NEM's 0.84%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.60%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
Debt growth far above NEM's 0.63%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
SG&A growth well above NEM's 6.78%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.