PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.54%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-33.72%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-35.05%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 12.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.05%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 12.72%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-89.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-88.89%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-88.89%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.10%
Share change of 0.10% while NEM is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while NEM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-47.61%
Dividend reduction while NEM stands at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.81%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
16.12%
FCF growth above 1.5x NEM's 7.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
163.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 5.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-10.49%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
10.49%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
171.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 81.91%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-26.75%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-0.73%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-6.14%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-64.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
132.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
222.43%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 11.78%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.26%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
8.87%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.77%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
86.39%
Below 50% of NEM's 395.67%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-84.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while NEM shows 16.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.33%
Debt growth far above NEM's 1.67%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.