PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.27%
Negative revenue growth while NEM stands at 2.07%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.18%
Negative gross profit growth while NEM is at 446.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-4.08%
Negative EBIT growth while NEM is at 298.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.08%
Negative operating income growth while NEM is at 298.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.61%
Negative net income growth while NEM stands at 105.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while NEM is at 104.35%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NEM is at 104.35%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x NEM's 17.89%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x NEM's 17.89%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-11.81%
Negative OCF growth while NEM is at 25.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.47%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 75.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
40.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
28.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 2.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-9.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
50.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NEM's 86.20%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
81.81%
Positive OCF/share growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-6.37%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
62.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
180.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
0.46%
Positive short-term CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 24.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
32.72%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NEM's 27.44%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
20.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.54%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.74%
Positive BV/share change while NEM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.23%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.25%
We cut SG&A while NEM invests at 20.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.