PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.62%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.89%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
136.68%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NEM's 20.80%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
147.14%
Positive operating income growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
188.14%
Net income growth above 1.5x NEM's 34.78%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
194.74%
EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 10600.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
194.74%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NEM's 10600.64%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 11.59%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 39.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
52.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 16.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.09%
Similar net income/share CAGR to NEM's 353.89%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
164.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 64.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
60.31%
Below 50% of NEM's 197.27%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.42%
We expand SG&A while NEM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.