PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Positive revenue growth while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.64%
Positive gross profit growth while NEM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.90%
EBIT growth 50-75% of NEM's 24.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
13.42%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NEM's 2.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
15.07%
Net income growth under 50% of NEM's 122.63%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 10.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while NEM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while NEM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth at 75-90% of NEM's 17.38%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
-74.72%
Negative FCF growth while NEM is at 166.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
172.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
100.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
65.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NEM is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 147.63%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to NEM's 159.74%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 63.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
384.37%
Below 50% of NEM's 2560.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
173.02%
Below 50% of NEM's 785.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
95.04%
Below 50% of NEM's 678.16%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 30.33%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 6.15%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 7.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
282.43%
Below 50% of NEM's 1053.93%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
76.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x NEM's 0.42%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
25.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while NEM cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
147.04%
Our AR growth while NEM is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Positive asset growth while NEM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.43%
75-90% of NEM's 4.20%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
1.99%
We have some new debt while NEM reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.