PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OR's 9.92%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.64%
Gross profit growth similar to OR's 10.18%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
13.90%
EBIT growth similar to OR's 15.15%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
13.42%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OR's 7.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
15.07%
Net income growth at 50-75% of OR's 26.20%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
14.29%
EPS growth at 50-75% of OR's 21.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of OR's 21.43%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.04%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.41%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.05%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.35%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 11.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-74.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 191.83%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 29.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
65.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 273.05%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 192.29%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 22738.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
384.37%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 301.80%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
173.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 117.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
95.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 86.14%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
53.97%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
40.97%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.77%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
282.43%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 39.70%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
76.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 3.79%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
25.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OR cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
147.04%
AR growth well above OR's 8.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth at 75-90% of OR's 3.85%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.43%
50-75% of OR's 5.86%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
1.99%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 19.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.