PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.49%
Revenue growth under 50% of OR's 9.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.48%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OR's 10.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.13%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 15.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.13%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 7.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-16.66%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 26.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Negative EPS growth while OR is at 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.21%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.41%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.66%
Reduced diluted shares while OR is at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.47%
OCF growth at 50-75% of OR's 11.49%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
8.47%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
180.75%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to OR's 191.83%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
89.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 29.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
92.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
629.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 192.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
189.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 22738.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 117.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 86.14%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1024.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
261.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x OR's 3.85%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.14%
We have a declining book value while OR shows 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
27.56%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.92%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 19.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.