95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.09%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 9.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.91%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 10.18%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.34%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 15.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.34%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 7.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-12.16%
Negative net income growth while OR stands at 26.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OR is at 21.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.85%
Negative OCF growth while OR is at 11.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-17.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
213.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OR's 191.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
160.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 29.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
25.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
445.64%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 192.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
24.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 22738.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
320.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 117.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
15.46%
Below 50% of OR's 86.14%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
443.23%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
64.29%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.90%
AR growth well above OR's 8.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Asset growth at 50-75% of OR's 3.85%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.12%
50-75% of OR's 5.86%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
270.10%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.61%
SG&A growth well above OR's 19.74%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.