PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Revenue growth of 11.63% while OR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
9.27%
Gross profit growth of 9.27% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
9.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 281.53%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
9.27%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 281.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-92.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 4.14%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 6.81%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.48%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
5Y CAGR of 107.92% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-11.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
154.13%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
132.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-88.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 91.18% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
40.25%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.25% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.67% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-64.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.13%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 1.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
2.66%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt growth of 0.03% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 274.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.