95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.48%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 21.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.49%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.71%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 75.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.71%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 75.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
124.21%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
123.81%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
123.81%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 24.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-14.72%
Negative OCF growth while OR is at 2.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
114.79%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
233.81%
10Y CAGR of 233.81% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
3.82%
5Y CAGR of 3.82% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-19.84%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
275.60%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-21.68%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-39.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
36.10%
Below 50% of OR's 99.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-70.63%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OR is 99.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-72.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR is 99.68%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
379.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 379.39% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.05% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.33% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.29%
AR growth of 64.29% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.23%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 21.41%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.14%
Under 50% of OR's 14.66%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.48%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.62%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.