PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.82%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of OR's 11.26%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
27.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 15.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
33.04%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 118.15%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
33.04%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 118.15%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
37.61%
Net income growth above 1.5x OR's 12.84%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
35.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 13.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
35.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 13.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.90%
Share count expansion well above OR's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above OR's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-47.91%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
20.34%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-582.88%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 384.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.16%
10Y CAGR of 179.16% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
0.97%
5Y CAGR of 0.97% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
13.13%
3Y CAGR of 13.13% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
185.85%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-22.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
9.91%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
84.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-50.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.06%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
302.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 302.23% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
57.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 57.24% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
20.67%
Equity/share CAGR of 20.67% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.03% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-56.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-15.57%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 21.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x OR's 3.26%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.65%
50-75% of OR's 3.13%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
90.51%
Debt growth far above OR's 0.49%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.58%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.