PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.84%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-5.28%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-86.91%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-86.84%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-86.84%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.19%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
17.11%
Dividend growth above 1.5x OR's 7.69%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
8.12%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
127.02%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
196.24%
10Y CAGR of 196.24% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
7.88%
5Y CAGR of 7.88% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
24.99%
3Y CAGR of 24.99% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
192.99%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-14.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
13.51%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-77.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-93.99%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-90.63%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.20%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
49.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
18.79%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.97%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-42.97%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OR invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-20.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.73%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while OR shows 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-11.30%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.99%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 19.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.