PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.42%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 24.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-18.86%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 25.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-23.52%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-23.52%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
463.45%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
460.00%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
460.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-31.36%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-31.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
124.38%
10Y CAGR of 124.38% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-20.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.10%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.65%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-41.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-15.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
22.82%
Below 50% of OR's 120.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-66.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OR is 120.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-37.90%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
256.57%
Equity/share CAGR of 256.57% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
44.22%
Equity/share CAGR of 44.22% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
17.38%
Equity/share CAGR of 17.38% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.26%
AR growth of 43.26% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.10%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.73%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OR's 0.36%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.81%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.57%
SG&A growth well above OR's 36.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.