PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Negative revenue growth while OR stands at 14.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 18.86%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Negative EBIT growth while OR is at 115.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-14.45%
Negative operating income growth while OR is at 115.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
149.47%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 103.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
148.39%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 102.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
148.39%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 102.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-24.07%
Negative OCF growth while OR is at 8.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.82%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 772.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
105.28%
10Y CAGR of 105.28% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-22.48%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 419.53%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
91.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-39.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 585.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Below 50% of OR's 107.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-59.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OR is 107.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
15.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
205.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 205.07% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
22.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 22.24% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-6.81%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 706.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.53%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.90%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.