95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.60%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OR's 9.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
2.05%
Positive gross profit growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2.39%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.39%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
367.01%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
380.00%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
380.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.13%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-483.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
115.86%
10Y CAGR of 115.86% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
1.89%
5Y CAGR of 1.89% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
17.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 700.69%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
90.20%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-13.59%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
12.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 71.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
590.04%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 100.03% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
258.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 100.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
439.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.59%
Equity/share CAGR of 227.59% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
30.26%
Equity/share CAGR of 30.26% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
6.84%
Below 50% of OR's 18.42%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
71.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 37.80%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
453.10%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.26%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.16%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OR's 1.22%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
44.27%
We have some new debt while OR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.15%
SG&A growth well above OR's 17.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.