PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OR's 3.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.55%
Positive gross profit growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-81.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-81.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
1.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OR cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.04%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
126.84%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
222.40%
10Y CAGR of 222.40% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-5.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 448.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-29.99%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-26.27%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 34.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
103.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
254.23%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 15.30%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
77.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 46.34%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
118.02%
AR growth well above OR's 160.21%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
SG&A growth well above OR's 35.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.