PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.48%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.24%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 15.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
61.16%
EBIT growth 75-90% of OR's 80.76%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
61.16%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of OR's 80.76%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
739.91%
Net income growth above 1.5x OR's 76.69%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
766.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 76.71%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
766.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OR's 76.71%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
8.97%
OCF growth under 50% of OR's 33.36%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
9.36%
FCF growth under 50% of OR's 89.12%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
264.31%
10Y CAGR of 264.31% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
9.44%
5Y CAGR of 9.44% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
8.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 312.47%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
210.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-17.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-5.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 83.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
130.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 8.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-42.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
26.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
180.93%
Equity/share CAGR of 180.93% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
22.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 22.48% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
14.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.13%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.04%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.01%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.36%
We cut SG&A while OR invests at 20.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.