PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
42.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OR's 5.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
173.43%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
173.43%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
160.92%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
160.71%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
160.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.23%
Slight or no buybacks while OR is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.31%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-48.78%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
30.24%
Similar OCF growth to OR's 32.52%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
30.44%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
124.83%
10Y CAGR of 124.83% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 271.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OR stands at 361.65%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is at 61.93%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.15%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 40.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
58.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1255.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-9.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
121.53%
Equity/share CAGR of 121.53% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.88%
Below 50% of OR's 156.36%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
3.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 45.92% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.54%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 31.80%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
156.25%
AR growth well above OR's 35.99%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.52%
Under 50% of OR's 5.98%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.47%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 6.36%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.