PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OR's 3.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
8.19%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 5.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
7.00%
EBIT growth 75-90% of OR's 9.21%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
7.00%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of OR's 9.21%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
3.04%
Net income growth under 50% of OR's 127.91%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.86%
EPS growth under 50% of OR's 115.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OR's 115.05%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 29.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60.86%
10Y CAGR of 60.86% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 156.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
60.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
43.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 47.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4.10%
Below 50% of OR's 134.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
254.38%
Below 50% of OR's 10613.27%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
134.22%
Below 50% of OR's 334.48%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
90.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 90.98% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
25.60%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
16.45%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 1186.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while OR stands at 83.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Negative asset growth while OR invests at 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.90%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-98.25%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
We expand SG&A while OR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.