PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OR's 1.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-0.52%
Negative gross profit growth while OR is at 2.86%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.37%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.37%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
116.27%
Positive net income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
116.67%
Positive EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
116.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Dividend growth under 50% of OR's 8.82%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-2.98%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-154.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
13.83%
10Y CAGR of 13.83% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
5.51%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 135.60%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
39.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.33%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
9.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
77.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
58.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2532.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
4117.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 82.74%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
84.86%
Positive growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.04%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
41.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 41.31% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
147.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 36.01%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
64.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 26.18%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
7.97%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
42.63%
We show growth while OR is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.12%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.09%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.08%
We’re deleveraging while OR stands at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.95%
SG&A growth well above OR's 5.28%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.