PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.43%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.37%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.76%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-21.46%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while OR is at 204.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OR stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-16.68%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-36.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
5.49%
Below 50% of OR's 66.47%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-24.69%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OR stands at 52.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-34.59%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OR is at 160.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
60.03%
Below 50% of OR's 670.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
16.20%
Below 50% of OR's 225.40%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 65.46% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
35.36%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
28.74%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while OR shows 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-37.75%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.15%
Asset growth above 1.5x OR's 0.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OR's 0.88%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OR's 18.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.