95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.19%
Revenue growth under 50% of OR's 6.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.00%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x OR's 6.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
6.22%
Positive EBIT growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6.22%
Positive operating income growth while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-25.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-25.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OR's 0.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while OR is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
OCF growth above 1.5x OR's 3.85%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
176.60%
FCF growth above 1.5x OR's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
58.74%
10Y CAGR of 58.74% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
55.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-10.17%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
79.88%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
110.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to OR's 103.95%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
7.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OR's 49.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
51.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
196.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-26.91%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 113.34%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
37.69%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
19.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
144.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 144.99% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
115.34%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 12.36%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
33.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 12.72%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
80.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OR's 304.84%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-8195400.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.97%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.18%
Positive BV/share change while OR is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.35%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.05%
SG&A growth well above OR's 3.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.