PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.09%
Positive revenue growth while OR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.25%
Positive gross profit growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.11%
EBIT growth below 50% of OR's 255.34%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.11%
Operating income growth under 50% of OR's 255.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
26.42%
Net income growth under 50% of OR's 186.61%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
25.93%
EPS growth under 50% of OR's 189.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.93%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OR's 189.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while OR is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.04%
Diluted share change of 0.04% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-49.72%
Dividend reduction while OR stands at 6.09%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
8.76%
Positive OCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.73%
Positive FCF growth while OR is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
46.83%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to OR's 50.02%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
35.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
13.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 3.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
66.91%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 108.18%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
76.04%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 28.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
25.43%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 3.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
2617.04%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
100.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of OR's 130.69%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
13.76%
Below 50% of OR's 818.75%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
59.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of OR's 118.18%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
37.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OR is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while OR is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
208.45%
Dividend/share CAGR of 208.45% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
111.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OR's 22.96%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
21.38%
3Y dividend/share CAGR similar to OR's 20.40%. Walter Schloss finds parallel short-term dividend strategies for both companies.
35.90%
Our AR growth while OR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while OR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.90%
Positive asset growth while OR is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OR's 0.01%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.27%
SG&A growth well above OR's 4.98%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.