PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.06%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-15.06%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 154.31%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1735.83%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 67.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1735.83%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 67.82%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-3021.48%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 70.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2983.33%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 71.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2983.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 69.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1836.26%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 258.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-1836.26%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 109.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-10.91%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 3467.43%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-10.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 25.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-10.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 23.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.46%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PAAS's 34.95%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-26.32%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 17.24%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-26.93%
We have a declining book value while PAAS shows 24.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.28%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 56.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.